How to render health care safely

If you are seeking an editor for your scientific document, take a moment to consider, first, what kind of document you have and the type of editing service(s) you need. For example, if you have a technical article that you want to publish in a specific journal, visit our article on finding an editor for a journal article; if you are writing a dissertation, visit our article for some helpful tips on selecting a dissertation editor or proofreader.

For any general scientific document or report, you might want to simplify the language so that the information becomes accessible to a wider audience of readers. If the document is difficult to read for the average person, your article might not be as widely viewed. You can reduce the word count without altering or oversimplifying key information. You can also format your manuscript to fit the specifications of a particular publication, which increases your chances of acceptance for publication.

We recommend that you explore editors whose experiences align most closely with your stated goals. For example, if you need help simplifying the language, you might consider an editor with teaching experience-after all, the main part of an instructor's job is to take complex material, distill it, and transmit it to those with less knowledge and experience. Likewise, if you need to reduce your word count or paraphrase specific sections, consider choosing an editor with academic or technical writing experience; being concise and straightforward is critically important in these areas. Finally, if you need to format your scientific paper for a particular publication's guidelines, look for an editor with experience in academic publishing, which might include service as a senior editor for a journal, a copy editor for a textbook company, or someone who has worked as a dissertation or thesis consultant in a higher education institution. I have created a new branch of knowledge called Value epistemology. Value epistemology has its mirroring in an ontology (Being) that is constructive. There are two types of ontology: one being constructive ontology and the other being destructive ontology.

Camus and Sartre are philosophers who have espoused a philosophy of ontological destruction. For them life is chaotic and absurd and having no meaning. They also celebrate a being going into a fallen pit of anarchy. Let's take Camus Myth of the Sisyphus. In it a man is condemned by the Gods to roll a boulder all the way uphill only to find that it rolls down. The man is forced to repeat this meaningless chore again and again. I would like to ask Camus: is life absurd? Is it chaotic! Camus' philosophy is an incoherent one. If we follow Camus philosophy we won't be able to live a life meaningfully. Aren't we living in a society where we celebrate the meaning of life? We are not beings living in isolation. We are living in a community of shared meanings- or should be live as egotistic individuals. Is life marked the absence of reason and passion? We are beings living in three states-Catharsis, Angst and Ecstasy. Meaning of life is existentially realized.

What does Sartre have to say of Ontological Existentialism? Sartre's Philosophy also celebrates the meaning of the absurd. Life for him is coherent mass of nothingness. We navigate our life by negating the meaning of existence. Is life chaotic and absurd? Is the choice we make to free ourselves meaningless one? Sartre goes on to say that: we are condemned to be free. How can we say that freedom is our condemnation? Was Sartre a psychological victim of World War II? Why is there so much negative theology in ontological philosophy?

I have read and reread existential Philosophers like Camus and Sartre and I have developed a new branch of existential ontology called constructive ontology. Constructive Ontology creates a new meaning that life is creative and having a purpose. We have to live a life in Valueblelization (from Value and Realization). Valueblelization means a creative living with celebration of sharing meanings in empathic harmony. For Valueblelization to occur an individual is a purposeist from (Purpose and ist). We have to authenticate ourselves in a democratic empathy of sharing meanings.

The main takeaway of this brief article is that, when you seek an editor, the most important consideration is the result you ultimately want to achieve. Remember, editors are humans whose previous experiences, education, and worldview influence how they see the world and the ways in which they approach a document. Moreover, while some editors are incredibly talented, no level of talent can make one a mind reader. Therefore, remember to identify clearly what your objectives are and communicate those to your editor, along with anything else that could be helpful, when you make your request.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harvard Health and Orca Health launch heart-focused iBook series

Studies reinforce life-saving benefits of colon cancer screening

PET scans peer into the heart of dementia